Why African politics should stop undermining socio-economic development
It is now widely known that politics sets the tone and context within which countries can convert natural resources such as land and minerals into better lives for citizens. However, the brand of politics in most African countries has continued to undermine socio-economic development in several ways. For instance, in agriculture-driven economies, it is rare to find former cabinet ministers operating successful agribusiness enterprises or participating in agricultural markets. Otherwise, former cabinet ministers would be the ones leading in exporting agricultural commodities and processed products across the globe because they have the networks and international exposure.
Sadly, because career politics has no pension, most former cabinet ministers and former members of parliament retire into poverty. Some may have big farms but have no clue how to unlock value from the land after spending years in government and parliament. That is why most end up desperately seeking re-election so that that they go back to the comfort and luxury associated with government and political offices.
Politics as a career does not co-exist with other careers or professions
Upon entering partisan politics, many Africans who will have trained as academics, engineers, medical doctors, agricultural economists and lawyers among other career path often realize that they cannot practice their original professions. The whole investment in acquiring academic knowledge and skill-sets is lost to politics. Those with passion for using their knowledge to uplift communities will not be able to do so through politics because politics has different rules and processes where knowledge has to be applied through political rallies and parliamentary sessions that are different from how the engineering or medical profession apply knowledge. That is why, after spending five to ten years pursuing a different career path, it is difficult for a medical doctor to come back and set up a surgery or an agricultural economist to run a farm profitably as the old knowledge will require more investment to refreshen and upgrade.
Conflicting roles between cabinet ministers and members of parliament
In countries like Zimbabwe, for one to be chosen as a cabinet minister, s/he has to be a member of parliament first. In other words, for you to be selected as a cabinet minister, you have to have a political constituency where local people will have voted you to be their member of parliament. This is problematic in many ways. A cabinet post and a member of parliament are two full time assignments that cannot be effectively executed by an individual at once. A member of parliament is supposed to attend to development and political issues in a particular constituency as well as participate in parliamentary duties through portfolio committees. If that individual is also a cabinet minister, s/he has to perform ministerial issues that cover the whole country, for instance agriculture or transport.
Assuming this individual has a personal agribusiness enterprise, s/he has to also has to attend to personal business. Combining cabinet roles, member of parliament roles, portfolio committee roles and personal business roles means the individual will need a miracle to satisfy all these roles properly. The individual will certainly have no time to understand community issues at great depth and will mostly be an absentee member of parliament whose fate will be sealed at the next election by being booted out for being an absentee member of parliament while on national duty.
Careers of cabinet ministers and member of parliament during their tenure are often unclear and that is why most perform dismally in their personal businesses such as agricultural enterprises. When they go back to the farm after being booted from cabinet or parliament, they have no clue where to start. Benefit from government and political office cease immediately and most are stuck at the farm with no transport to visit the city. Being public figures for the rest of their lives, former cabinet ministers and members of parliament are often shy to be seen using public transport although they may not have personal vehicles. The CV in the political career has no references.
Unfortunate dominance of politics in all facets of life
In countries like Zimbabwe, it has become unfortunate that politics now dominates all facets of life to the extent that politicians like members of parliament claim credit for all developments in communities including what communities accomplish using their own resources and initiatives. While traditional leaders like Chiefs are custodians of natural resources and local food systems, it is as if Chiefs and traditional leaders no longer have their own initiatives based on their indigenous knowledge as everything gets linked to politics. For instance, cabinet ministers and members of parliament officiate at local events like commissioning a bridge or a clinic which should be done by the chief. The chief will just be a passenger, given the ceremonial role of thanking the cabinet minister or member of parliament for officiating at an event that should be handled traditionally.
With all social and economic activities turned into political initiatives, it is becoming difficult to bring communities together for a common purpose that has nothing to do with partisan politics. For instance, a headman who wants to bring people together has to be sanctioned by a councillor who belongs to a political party. As if that is not bad enough, when campaigning, aspiring members of parliament give communities wrong expectations by campaigning as if they will permanently solve issues like poor roads and water sources. Food hand-outs are used to give people the impression that, after voting this individual into office, the people will live the life being exhibited. It is like a young man buying a pizza for a girl to give the impression that she will be eating pizza everyday once they are married.
The authentic way of campaigning by aspiring members of parliament should focus on enlightening local people to their abundant natural resources. The aspiring member of parliament’s role should include guiding them in exploiting and protecting those resources such as food systems and taking their development issues to the right national policy offices. In addition to capacitating communities to develop themselves, protect their natural resources and work together to feel proud of their achievements, the aspiring member of parliament should become a watchdog for community-driven development.
The curse of colonial politics and related structures
On the contrary, abundant evidence shows how politics is derailing development by dividing African communities and undermining traditional leadership structures that previously had clear pathways. In the traditional leadership structures, some people were considered leaders because of their wisdom not by election. Others earned leadership roles through their talents like beating drums at traditional ceremonies and rituals. Colonial politics and structures are not able to work hand in hand with African traditional leadership structures because they are built around material wealth while traditional structures are built around communities as families. Colonial African politics uses vehicles and gifts to buy allegiance but that should not be the way leaders are selected because although they may be given material resources, some leaders continue to lack leadership qualities. Leadership is now about money and this leads to African countries losing good leadership qualities especially among women, most of who are gifted to lead from the heart although they do not have money.
Some national roles and duties are related to specific expertise and should have nothing to do with holding political office like member of parliament. Policy makers should spend time identifying experts who can run government departments based on unique expertise not political elections. How can a whole minister of finance who should be in office 24/7 be expected to have a political constituency? The same applies to the ministry of mines or transport or agriculture whose mandates are largely national. Where a member of parliament is also a cabinet minister responsible for transport, for instance, his/her constituency will judge his/her performance based on the national office s/he is holding not local constituency issues. For instance, they will wonder why his/her constituency has poor road network yet s/he is the minister of transport. Ordinary people will not know that the minister has no power to commandeer national resources to the local constituency.
In most cases, members of parliament confuse the relationship between what they do as politicians and their businesses as personal careers. There is need to reclaim intellectuals and experts who have lost their knowledge and original careers in pursuit of politics. As part of recognizing their knowledge and contribution, such people should receive packages which could also be used as incentives for them to retire so that young people take over important national roles. This will prevent the embarrassment of old people being booted out through elections after 20 years in politics. When politics is taken as a career, key socio-economic national sectors lose the best brains to politics and this retards socio-economic development.
For most African countries, every election year brings the country and the economy to a halt as government officers stop doing their duties properly. For instance, in communities where more than 10 candidates are campaigning for votes from the same people, communities are traumatized to the point of failing to execute their socio-economic activities. The shame of losing elections by seating cabinet ministers and members of parliament affects the socio-economic mood and strangles decision-making processes. Lack of succession pathways also disrupts development as the one who is booted out through elections goes with his/her knowledge. The new cabinet minister and member of parliament introduces new projects as the one going out leaves incomplete work that may have huge potential for uplifting communities but the new person want to start his/her own thing.
Parliament as platform for consolidating knowledge
Most African countries have not been able to use the parliament as a platform for consolidating knowledge from diverse communities. Bills and policies are passed haphazardly due to the political divide and issues are not scrutinized carefully. There are issues which do not need consensus but can be better handled through expertise or combining traditional wisdom with subject matter expertise. After being debated by members of parliament, some issues are better handed to technocrats for consolidation. Putting everything to a vote is an indication that African countries have adopted colonial systems without in-depth knowledge on why those systems were set up. This is part of the dilemma of the capture of traditional African systems by partisan politics as well as capture of African food systems and natural resources.
charles@knowledgetransafrica.com / charles@emkambo.co.zw /
info@knowledgetransafrica.com
Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com
Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/ 0712 737 430